The procrastinator's paradise
 
  Untitled Document
  FEATURES
> Most Recent
> Originals Archive
> Links Archive

  INFO
> Store
> Favorite Sites
> About



Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

FEATURED BOOK
More
recommended books...

 

ADVERTISING
Austin bankruptcy lawyer

Experienced, friendly bankruptcy attorneys in Austin, TX.
 
Austin divorce lawyer

Experienced, attorneys with a passion for helping people.

 

   POLITICS
 
Which Is The Party Of Inclusion?
by Joe Mariani of Useless-Knowledge
Sept 9, 2003
 
Tell a Friend Make a Comment
 
 

Whom will the Republicans run for president in 2008? This question came up during a recent argument with a liberal (a waste of time, more or less, but sometimes useful for sharpening one’s mental claws). My answer seemed to shock him. Personally, I’d like to see Colin Powell in the Oval Office, but I don’t think he’ll run. Condoleezza Rice would also make a good president, in my opinion. The liberal was stunned by this, and said that seemed incredibly progressive for the Republican Party. I therefore took the opportunity to enlighten him.

The liberals like to portray their pet political party, the Democrats, as “the party of inclusion” or “the big-tent party,” while denouncing Republicans as anti-minority and anti-women. Historically, nothing could be further from the truth. It’s just another liberal lie.
The first woman in Congress was Jeanette Rankin, a Republican from Montana elected in 1916. Her platform included universal suffrage, Prohibition, child welfare reform, an end to child labor, and staying out of World War I. Does that sound like the anti-woman, warmongering Republican Party the liberals like to describe? Not to me.

The first black congressman was Joseph Hayne Rainey, a Republican from South Carolina and a former slave. Rainey’s father purchased the family’s freedom and became a barber. Rainey was one of the more conservative black leaders during Reconstruction; he favored a poll tax as a requirement for voting, with the revenues devoted to public education (the measure didn’t pass). Elected to Congress in 1870, he supported an amnesty bill to remove remaining liabilities on former Confederates while simultaneously promoting a civil rights bill. Does that fit the Liberal profile of Republicans? No.

The first black senator was also a Republican named Blanche K. Bruce of Mississippi. Born a slave, he escaped at the beginning of the Civil War and tried to enlist in the Union Army. He was elected to the Senate in 1874, encouraging the government to be more generous in issuing western land grants to blacks and favoring distribution of duty-free clothing from England to needy blacks. Senator Bruce also worked for the desegregation of United States Army units. Again . . . does this fit in with the view of Republicans the liberals force-feed their adherents? Hardly.

The first woman to run for president on a major party ticket, as well as serve in both houses of Congress, was Margaret Chase Smith, a Republican from Maine. Elected in 1940, she supported appropriation for childcare and helped women in military service by establishing WAVES (Women Accepted for Voluntary Emergency Service) and the Army-Navy Permanent Nurses Corps. She worked for retirement benefits, equal pay, and equal rank for women. She then ran for the Senate in 1948 and won, serving for 24 years. During that time, in 1964, Senator Smith ran for president on the Republican Party ticket and received 27 nominating votes at the Republican Convention.

Which political party is really the party of inclusion, and which pigeonholes people based on race, creed, or sex? Which party promotes people based on their individual merits, and which sees people only as representatives of a group? When you look fairly at the facts, the “big tent” the Democrats claim to be under is just a circus tent.

CavalierX@yahoo.com

 
 
      © 2003, 2004 Buttafly.com